Draft NHMRC Public Statement 2017: Water fluoridation and human health in Australia submission

ID:

This submission reflects the views of

Organisation Name:

Australian Dental and Oral Health Therapists' Association

Personal Details

Question 1

Q1. A. The draft Public Statement is presented in a format and manner that is useful, and is easy to read and understand:

Agree

Comments on a particular section of the Public Statement:

Question 2

Q2. A. The boxed ‘NHMRC statement’ (page one) in the draft Public Statement is justified and supported by the evidence in the Information Paper: Effects of Water Fluoridation on Dental and Other Human Health Outcomes :

Agree

Question 3

Q3. A. For policy makers, the draft Public Statement provides sufficient information to support decision making in your jurisdiction or local area:

Comments on a particular section of the Public Statement:

Question 4

Q4. How could the Public Statement be effectively disseminated?:

Who would find the draft Public Statement useful?

Dental and general health organisations

local and state/territory governments

non government health agencies

consumer health groups

public and private dental practices and community health centres

How could they easily access/obtain the draft Public Statement?

electronic dissemination to these organisations with requests for them to furhter disseminate to their networks

Question 5

Q5. Is there any other information that may be useful to include in the draft Public Statement? If so, please provide details:

nil

NHMRC Public Consultations

Draft NHMRC Public Statement 2017: Water fluoridation and human health in Australia submission