NHMRC Public Consultations

Skip Navigation and go to Content
Visit NHMRC website

Revised draft A Guide to the Use of Australian Native Mammals in Biomedical Sciences submission

ID: 
24
B. Please provide contact details

Personal information provided, e.g. contact details, will only be used for the purposes of developing resources relevant to this consultation document and will not be disclosed outside of members of NHMRC staff and NHMRC Committees. Such Information will not be used or disclosed for any other purpose, without prior written consent.

First Name: 
Helen
Last Name: 
Waudby
E. Specific comments
Specific comments: 
Purpose of the Guide

I have summarised my comments in dot-point format below. In general, the Guide is poorly written and lacks focus, although it is commendable that the NHMRC intends to produce a guide for such an important topic. The endeavour is highly worthwhile; the draft Guide just needs to be refocussed and the authors really need to consider the implications of what they are suggesting for wild animals.

At no point does the Guide define “biomedical research”. Biomedical research should be defined very clearly in the “Purpose of the Guide” and again in the “General Considerations” section

General considerations
  • Under “General considerations”, a number of broad examples are given of how native mammal research has made contributions to science. These examples should be more specific than they currently are (to provide context) and should be referenced in-text.
  • The document should state very clearly that in all situations, the use of captive-bred animals is preferred.
  • In “General Considerations” it is stated that “scientific research using Australian native mammals is essential to our understanding of their biology”. However, that is not the focus of this Guide. This Guide is concerned with biomedical research only and should address that topic only. Also, in “General Considerations” the Guide comments on the conservation of native animals; that is not the purpose of this document and it should not suggest that conservation of native animals is part of its purpose. It is simply a guide to the ethical use of native animals in biomedical research.
  • Under “Sources”, it should be made explicit that all researchers using native animals (any animals in fact) have to pass an ethics review process and obtain a scientific permit from their relevant National Parks and Wildlife Service (if obtaining wild animals, which they should avoid anyway). It is not merely a process of contacting authorities to gain more information; the ethics and permit applications involved are extensive. Currently, the Guide skips over that fact.
F. General comments
Comments: 
  • Biomedical research, if used for the study of human health, should not utilise wild native animals. However, (as an example) the use of wild animals may be acceptable if they are being used to study the efficacy of contraceptives for control purposes in those species, if it is not possible to do so with captive animals. If the authors feel that there is a pressing need to use wild animals in biomedical research then they should give examples of where this situation may occur.
  • To suggest that it is acceptable to use wild, threatened species in research is irresponsible. Do not address that theme; if researchers feel that it is absolutely necessary to use threatened species then they will need to support their arguments to their ethics committees and when attempting to gain a permit from their state National Parks and Wildlife Office (or similar).
  • The Guide attempts to give detailed information on the trapping of wild animals; these sections should be removed completely. Researchers should seek advice from experts in the field if they feel the need to capture wild animals (they should avoid that at all costs), not refer to information in this Guide, which cannot possibly give sufficiently detailed information to guide the trapping of wild animals. The trapping, handling, and housing of wild animals are complicated and cannot be addressed adequately in this document. It is stated in the “Purpose of the Guide” that the document is not intended to be an “exhaustive source of information...” and yet it proceeds to do exactly that by providing information on trapping of wild animals. The topic of animal trapping is treated very flippantly in the Guide overall.
  • The Guide requires extensive editing to ensure that it is correct grammatically and that expression is clear. I.e. “taxa” is the plural form of “taxon”; the word “taxons” does not exist.

In summary, the Guide should a) define “biomedical research” in the context of this document, b) remove information relating to the capture of wild animals (it cannot be dealt with adequately here and should not be promoted as a means of gathering study animals anyway), c) remove references to the conservation of native animals (that is not the purpose of this document), d) remove the suggestion that it might be appropriate to capture, threatened wild animals, and e) undergo an extensive editing process.

G. Upload your submission
Your submission: 

Page reviewed: 24 April, 2014