2.1 Other sources of transmission include: The word 'exogenous flora' needs to be added (endogenous is used but not exogenous)
Direct contact: e.g. percutaneous or mucous membrane exposure, direct care pathogens e.g. lice, scabies herpes simplex virus, faecal-oral diarrheal illnesses
droplet (pathogens often >than 5micons); examples add flu-like illnesses, and note here often droplet and contact precautionary measures are used simultaneously
airborne (pathogens often smaller than 5 microns), but aerolisation of larger pathogens can occur during procedures e.g...... Note chickenpox and measles can be spread via the contact route due to the presence of a rash/skin lesions and thus precautionary measures address both contact and airborne routes.
Transmission can also occur via vectors e.g. malaria, Zika, Ross River, Hendra etc via mosquitos which is not addressed in this paper
Standard Precautions: need to write at the start of the provided information that must be used for all persons regardless of known or suspected pathogens being transmitted via the contact, droplet or airborne routes
Standard precautions implemented by add: appropriate patient placement, occupational health and safety (e.g. appropriate staff screening and immune to vaccine preventable diseases), waste management, targeting epidemiologically important pathogens (emerging and re-emerging)
Case study measles: what about the contact risk due to contaminated environment due to skin lesions needs addressing: cleaning of the environment and used medical non-medical equipment: identifying patient list of appointments for any immunocompromised clients known to have visited the site during the infectious period; administration of immunoglobulin to high at risk immunocompromised clients with consultation of primary health care management/Infectious Diseases
Why is "Educate infectious patients to report their infectious state prior to attending practice" considered hard this should be encouraged and implemented in all settings as possible???
Involving patients in their care: what about educating family members and visitors where appropriate and ensuring their adherence to implemented precautions: needs to be addressed and added
Hand Hygiene what are the risk: Need to add "not resticted to" when giving the examples of organisims spread via hands
PPE: Following statement what has this got to do with IC (quality or safety)??? "Inappropriate wearing of PPE (e.g. wearing operating suite/room attire in the public areas of a hospital or wearing such attire outside the facility) may also lead to a public perception of poor practice within the facility." I believe needs to be deleted or added as a tip only
This statement can be missed interpreted what about in the ward areas?? "...clothing that has been in contact with patients should not be worn outside the patient-care area.." needs rewording and e.g. theatre attire, burns attire, PPE used during transmission based precautions, etc. about the risk of bringing external contaminates into the institution and contaminating the clients and environment in these high risk areas???
Ties and Lanyards: YES but what is your recommendation?????
There is no evidence to suggest that home laundering is inferior to commercial reprocessing of uniforms [90??? What about detergent and temperature of the water and mixing contaminated clothing/uniforms with other clothes at home
Under PPE donning sequence:
Note that for surgical procedures and dentistry, the sequence for putting on PPE differs. in these situations, masks and protective eyewear are applied first prior to hand preparation. Gown and gloves are then put on. (See Section 3.4.3).
WHY???? You still want to protect your mucous membranes, so add hand hygiene again before donning masks and protective eyewear
For gowns: covers exposed skin and protects the uniform i.e. long sleeve, gloves to cover the cuff, water proof (non-splash/spray) or water resistant if exposure to body fluid is expected/anticipated
Add when aprons are ok to be used in preference to gowns (and cost saving is not a reason!!)
Safety engineered Devices: The use of devices with safety-engineered protective features (e.g. safety or retractable devices) has been mandated in the US, France, Spain, most Canadian provinces and all EU member countries including the UK [114]. Their use is thought to have reduced the rate of incidence of needlestick injuries [115].
WHAT about Australia re this???? "At time of writing Australia......."
Needless Devices: note needs to be added re allergic reaction or exposure to cerebral spinal fluid, mucous membranes for CHG
Multi-dose vials
Add precautionary measure: preparing single doses in a pharmacy prior to distribution (as a single patient/single dose)
Sharps container: add features of an appropriate sharps container: well labelled, rigid, puncture proof, preferable wall mounted/secure that it does not fall