Q1. Is the draft Information Paper presented and written in a manner that is easy to understand?:
No. This paper is full of 'medical jargon'.
Q2. Does the draft Information Paper clearly outline how the evidence was reviewed and interpreted by the Homeopathy Working Committee?:
Is there ANYONE on the Homeopathic Working Committee who has the experience and knowledge of International Standard Classical Homeopathy? A Homeopathic expert? The whole process comes from completely blind acceptance of Modern Medicine built on faulty trials by people who fail to comprehend the process of understanding and treating the patient as a whole rather than his or her symptoms.
Where is the freedom and autonomy of the individual to choose how to live in this modern chaos of 'double blind' trials, side effects and long term chronic diseases which are constantly being reviewed with altered treatments?
As a Registered Homeopath from UK, I am aware of the huge media attack and the ensuing reduction in the numbers 'allowed' to request Homeopathy through the NHS. Having worked in hospitals for years as a nurse and midwife since 1962, I have been inspired by Homeopathy and its successes since I discovered it in 1982.
I challenge the right of those who know little of the successes of Homeopathic Healing to dismiss it so clumsily. As a lifelong student, I have been to many Homeopathic seminars Internationally with world class teachers over the past 30+ years.
What are we up against? Ignorance, bias and pressure from Pharmaceutical giants.
Q3. Is there additional evidence on the effectiveness of homeopathy for the treatment of clinical conditions in humans that needs to be considered? To be considered in public consultation any additional evidence must::
There have been so many studies on successful Homeopathic trials. BUT they do not subscribe to your language!. We have our own!
Homeopathy treats people as individuals, not as symptoms. We do not DO double blind trials!
